Skip to main content Skip to search
Personality Predicts Utilization of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction During and Post-Intervention in a Community Sample of Older Adults
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)
Short Title: J.Altern.Complement.Med.
Format: Journal Article
Publication Date: Nov 30, 2015
Pages: 390 - 395
Sources ID: 44806
Notes: LR: 20180109; GR: R01 AG025474/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States; GR: U54 GM104940/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States; JID: 9508124; 2016/04/01 06:00 [entrez]; 2016/04/01 06:00 [pubmed]; 2017/02/07 06:00 [medline]; ppublish
Visibility: Private
Abstract: (Show)
OBJECTIVES: Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a promising intervention for older adults seeking to improve quality of life. More research is needed, however, to determine who is most willing to use the four techniques taught in the program (yoga, sitting meditation, informal meditation, and body scanning). This study evaluated the relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, conscientiousness, and agreeableness) and use of MBSR techniques both during the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up. The hypothesis was that those with higher levels of openness and agreeableness would be more likely to use the techniques. METHODS: Participants were a community sample of 100 older adults who received an 8-week manualized MBSR intervention. Personality was assessed at baseline by using the 60-item NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Use of MBSR techniques was assessed through weekly practice logs during the intervention and a 6-month follow-up survey. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between each personality dimension and each indicator of MBSR use both during and after the intervention. RESULTS: As hypothesized, openness and agreeableness predicted greater use of MBSR both during and after the intervention, while controlling for demographic differences in age, educational level, and sex. Openness was related to use of a variety of MBSR techniques during and after the intervention, while agreeableness was related to use of meditation techniques during the intervention. Mediation analysis suggested that personality explained postintervention MBSR use, both directly and by fostering initial uptake of MBSR during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Personality dimensions accounted for individual differences in the use of MBSR techniques during and 6 months after the intervention. Future studies should consider how mental health practitioners would use these findings to target and tailor MBSR interventions to appeal to broader segments of the population.