Skip to main content Skip to search
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Purpose: This paper reviews 10 principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity and considerations in applying them to the damaged brain.Method: Neuroscience research using a variety of models of learning, neurological disease, and trauma are reviewed from the perspective of basic neuroscientists but in a manner intended to be useful for the development of more effective clinical rehabilitation interventions. Results: Neural plasticity is believed to be the basis for both learning in the intact brain and relearning in the damaged brain that occurs through physical rehabilitation. Neuroscience research has made significant advances in understanding experiencedependent neural plasticity, and these findings are beginning to be integrated with research on the degenerative and regenerative effects of brain damage. The qualities and constraints of experience-dependent neural plasticity are likely to be of major relevance to rehabilitation efforts in humans with brain damage. However, some research topics need much more attention in order to enhance the translation of this area of neuroscience to clinical research and practice. Conclusion: The growing understanding of the nature of brain plasticity raises optimism that this knowledge can be capitalized upon to improve rehabilitation efforts and to optimize functional outcome.

In humans and other animals, sufficient unilateral damage to the sensorimotor cortex can cause impairments in the opposite forelimb and the development of a hyper-reliance on the nonimpaired limb. This hyper-reliance is adaptive to the extent that it contributes to functional compensation for lesion-induced impairments. We have found that unilateral lesions of the forelimb region of the sensorimotor cortex (FLsmc) in rats, or callosal transections, cause neurons of the opposite motor cortex to become exceptionally responsive to changes in forelimb behavior. This enhanced responsiveness might facilitate learning of compensatory strategies with the nonimpaired forelimb after unilateral FLsmc lesions. The possibility that these lesions facilitate learning with the nonimpaired forelimb was addressed in this study. Rats were required to learn a skilled forelimb reaching task after either unilateral FLsmc lesions or sham operations. The trained limb in animals with lesions was the nonimpaired limb. Compared with shams, rats with unilateral lesions had a greater rate of acquisition and asymptotic performance level on the task, which was especially evident on more difficult trials. Quantitative measures of microtubule associated protein-2 (MAP2) immunostained dendrites indicated an enhancement of training-induced dendritic cytoskeletal changes in the motor cortex opposite lesions. Thus, unilateral FLsmc lesions facilitate learning of at least some types of motor skills using the nonimpaired forelimb as well as some of the neuronal changes associated with this learning. This facilitation could be a substrate underlying behavioral compensation for unilateral FLsmc damage and may contribute to the phenomenon of learned nonuse of the impaired limb.