<p>In this review article, van der Kuijp heavily critiques G. W. Houston's <em>Sources for a History of the bSam-yas Debate</em>. Among the problems that van der Kuijp notes of Houston's work: not using a broader range of Tibetan texts dealing with the subject, not tracing sources cited in the texts he does use, poor translating, and a lack of text critical methods in general. Van der Kuijp lists several texts that he feels would be useful in a study of the Samyé (bsam yas) Debate. In the appendix, he gives a survey of the text historical issues involved with a text titled <em>Sba bzhed</em>, or <em>Rba bzhed</em>, an early but complicated source of Tibetan history.</p>
<p>This article surveys the history of Sangpu Neutok (gsang phu ne'u thog), drawing on a number of Tibetan sources and focusing on the monastery's first two hundred years.(Kevin Vose 2004-04-06)</p>
<p>The text attempts to consolidate scattered information regarding Chapa Chökyi Senggé (phya pa chos kyi seng ge) and his influence on the development of Tibetan logical theory. (Mark Premo-Hopkins, 2004-02-03)</p>
Pages |