Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
An assessment of the Bhutanese traditional medicine for its ethnopharmacology, ethnobotany and ethnoquality: Textual understanding and the current practices
Contextually based assessments reveal the circumstances accompanying maladjustment (the when, where, and with whom) and supply clues to the motivations underpinning problem behaviors. The Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents (ASCA) is a teacher rating scale composed of indicators describing behavior in 24 classroom situational contexts. This study examines the Trinidad and Tobago national normative process for the ASCA contextual dimensions with a representative sample of elementary school children (N = 900). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded the same three dimensions (peer context problems, teacher context problems, and learning context problems) observed in U.S. national samples. Dimensions were scaled using item response theory (IRT) and Bayesian scoring methods, with peer and learning context problems scores relating more strongly to clinical behavior disturbances and learning context problems showing stronger association with classroom learning styles. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
We are at a key juncture in history where biodiversity loss is occurring daily and accelerating in the face of population growth, climate change, and rampant development. Simultaneously, we are just beginning to appreciate the wealth of human health benefits that stem from experiencing nature and biodiversity. Here we assessed the state of knowledge on relationships between human health and nature and biodiversity, and prepared a comprehensive listing of reported health effects. We found strong evidence linking biodiversity with production of ecosystem services and between nature exposure and human health, but many of these studies were limited in rigor and often only correlative. Much less information is available to link biodiversity and health. However, some robust studies indicate that exposure to microbial biodiversity can improve health, specifically in reducing certain allergic and respiratory diseases. Overall, much more research is needed on mechanisms of causation. Also needed are a re-envisioning of land-use planning that places human well-being at the center and a new coalition of ecologists, health and social scientists and planners to conduct research and develop policies that promote human interaction with nature and biodiversity. Improvements in these areas should enhance human health and ecosystem, community, as well as human resilience.
Using data for 25,780 species categorized on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, we present an assessment of the status of the world’s vertebrates. One-fifth of species are classified as Threatened, and we show that this figure is increasing: On average, 52 species of mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction each year. However, this overall pattern conceals the impact of conservation successes, and we show that the rate of deterioration would have been at least one-fifth again as much in the absence of these. Nonetheless, current conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of biodiversity loss in these groups: agricultural expansion, logging, overexploitation, and invasive alien species.Though the threat of extinction is increasing, overall declines would have been worse in the absence of conservation.
Though the threat of extinction is increasing, overall declines would have been worse in the absence of conservation.
Zotero Collections:
Cognitive theorists describe mindfulness as a form of attention-awareness in which thoughts can be observed in non-judging, de-centered, and non-attached ways. However, empirical research has not examined associations between mindfulness and responses to negative automatic thoughts, such as the ability to let go of negative cognition. In the first study reported in this article, measures of dispositional mindfulness were negatively correlated with negative thought frequency and perceptions of the ability to let go of negative thoughts in an unselected student sample. In the second study reported, these associations were replicated in a treatment-seeking student sample, where participation in a mindfulness meditation-based clinical intervention was shown to be associated with decreases in both frequency and perceptions of difficulty in letting-go of negative automatic thoughts. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in patients with breast cancer. Methods The medline, Cochrane Library, embase, cambase, and PsycInfo databases were screened through November 2011. The search strategy combined keywords for MBSR and MBCT with keywords for breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MBSR or MBCT with control conditions in patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias in the selected studies. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two authors independently. Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life and psychological health. If at least two studies assessing an outcome were available, standardized mean differences (SMDS) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for that outcome. As a measure of heterogeneity, I 2 was calculated. Results Three RCTs with a total of 327 subjects were included. One RCT compared MBSR with usual care, one RCT compared MBSR with free-choice stress management, and a three-arm RCT compared MBSR with usual care and with nutrition education. Compared with usual care, MBSR was superior in decreasing depression (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and anxiety (SMD: -0.51; 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.21; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 0%), but not in increasing spirituality (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI: -0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.41; I 2 = 79%). Conclusions There is some evidence for the effectiveness of MBSR in improving psychological health in breast cancer patients, but more RCTs are needed to underpin those results. © 2012 Multimed Inc.
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in patients with breast cancer. Methods The medline, Cochrane Library, embase, cambase, and PsycInfo databases were screened through November 2011. The search strategy combined keywords for MBSR and MBCT with keywords for breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MBSR or MBCT with control conditions in patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias in the selected studies. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two authors independently. Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life and psychological health. If at least two studies assessing an outcome were available, standardized mean differences (SMDS) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for that outcome. As a measure of heterogeneity, I 2 was calculated. Results Three RCTs with a total of 327 subjects were included. One RCT compared MBSR with usual care, one RCT compared MBSR with free-choice stress management, and a three-arm RCT compared MBSR with usual care and with nutrition education. Compared with usual care, MBSR was superior in decreasing depression (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and anxiety (SMD: -0.51; 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.21; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 0%), but not in increasing spirituality (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI: -0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.41; I 2 = 79%). Conclusions There is some evidence for the effectiveness of MBSR in improving psychological health in breast cancer patients, but more RCTs are needed to underpin those results. © 2012 Multimed Inc.
ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (mbsr) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (mbct) in patients with breast cancer.
Methods
The medline, Cochrane Library, embase, cambase, and PsycInfo databases were screened through November 2011. The search strategy combined keywords for mbsr and mbct with keywords for breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing mbsr or mbct with control conditions in patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias in the selected studies. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two authors independently. Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life and psychological health. If at least two studies assessing an outcome were available, standardized mean differences (smds) and 95% confidence intervals (cis) were calculated for that outcome. As a measure of heterogeneity, I 2 was calculated.
Results
Three rcts with a total of 327 subjects were included. One rct compared mbsr with usual care, one rct compared mbsr with free-choice stress management, and a three-arm rct compared mbsr with usual care and with nutrition education. Compared with usual care, mbsr was superior in decreasing depression (smd: –0.37; 95% ci: –0.65 to –0.08; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and anxiety (smd: –0.51; 95% ci: –0.80 to –0.21; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 0%), but not in increasing spirituality (smd: 0.27; 95% ci: –0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.41; I 2 = 79%).
Conclusions
There is some evidence for the effectiveness of mbsr in improving psychological health in breast cancer patients, but more rcts are needed to underpin those results.
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in patients with breast cancer. Methods The medline, Cochrane Library, embase, cambase, and PsycInfo databases were screened through November 2011. The search strategy combined keywords for MBSR and MBCT with keywords for breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MBSR or MBCT with control conditions in patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias in the selected studies. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two authors independently. Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life and psychological health. If at least two studies assessing an outcome were available, standardized mean differences (SMDS) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for that outcome. As a measure of heterogeneity, I 2 was calculated. Results Three RCTs with a total of 327 subjects were included. One RCT compared MBSR with usual care, one RCT compared MBSR with free-choice stress management, and a three-arm RCT compared MBSR with usual care and with nutrition education. Compared with usual care, MBSR was superior in decreasing depression (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and anxiety (SMD: -0.51; 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.21; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 0%), but not in increasing spirituality (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI: -0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.41; I 2 = 79%). Conclusions There is some evidence for the effectiveness of MBSR in improving psychological health in breast cancer patients, but more RCTs are needed to underpin those results. © 2012 Multimed Inc.
The Devereux Student Strengths Assessment Mini (DESSA-Mini; Naglieri, LeBuffe, & Shapiro, 2011/2014) was designed to overcome practical obstacles to universal prevention screening. This article seeks to determine whether an entirely strength-based, 8-item screening instrument achieves technical accuracy in routine practice. Data come from a district-wide implementation of a new social emotional learning (SEL) initiative designed to promote students' social-emotional competence. All students, kindergarten through Grade 8, were screened using the DESSA-Mini. A random 5 students per classroom received additional assessment. Concurrent and predictive criterion studies were conducted using the full DESSA as well as administrative records of serious disciplinary infraction. The DESSA-Mini showed excellent internal reliability, exceeding .90. Negligible to small differences were found between scores on the DESSA-Mini screen and the DESSA full assessment. Classification consistency between the DESSA-Mini and the DESSA was high (87%-94%) in routine practice, with sensitivity and specificity estimates exceeding Glascoe's (2005) standards. Finally, predictive validity of the DESSA-Mini was reliable; students screened as having a Need for SEL Instruction at the beginning of the year were 4.5 times more likely to have a record of serious disciplinary infraction at the end of the school year compared with those who were not identified (p < .001). These findings compare quite favorably with other instruments used in schools to screen entire student populations, in cases where such analyses have been conducted, and is consistent with a practice preference of identifying, but not overidentifying, students for accelerated preventative interventions for mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. (PsycINFO Database Record
The Devereux Student Strengths Assessment Mini (DESSA-Mini; Naglieri, LeBuffe, & Shapiro, 2011/2014) was designed to overcome practical obstacles to universal prevention screening. This article seeks to determine whether an entirely strength-based, 8-item screening instrument achieves technical accuracy in routine practice. Data come from a district-wide implementation of a new social emotional learning (SEL) initiative designed to promote students' social-emotional competence. All students, kindergarten through Grade 8, were screened using the DESSA-Mini. A random 5 students per classroom received additional assessment. Concurrent and predictive criterion studies were conducted using the full DESSA as well as administrative records of serious disciplinary infraction. The DESSA-Mini showed excellent internal reliability, exceeding .90. Negligible to small differences were found between scores on the DESSA-Mini screen and the DESSA full assessment. Classification consistency between the DESSA-Mini and the DESSA was high (87%-94%) in routine practice, with sensitivity and specificity estimates exceeding Glascoe's (2005) standards. Finally, predictive validity of the DESSA-Mini was reliable; students screened as having a Need for SEL Instruction at the beginning of the year were 4.5 times more likely to have a record of serious disciplinary infraction at the end of the school year compared with those who were not identified (p < .001). These findings compare quite favorably with other instruments used in schools to screen entire student populations, in cases where such analyses have been conducted, and is consistent with a practice preference of identifying, but not overidentifying, students for accelerated preventative interventions for mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. (PsycINFO Database Record
Past research has shown that rumination, experiential avoidance and mindfulness are important cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the aetiology of depressive symptoms. There is still little knowledge of their relative importance as predictors of depressive symptomology in a longitudinal design. Participants from a student-sample (N=208) completed measures of depressive symptoms, rumination, experiential avoidance and mindfulness at two assessments separated by a 12-month period. Results showed that in combination only more trait mindfulness was associated with less depressive symptoms at follow-up, even when taken into account baseline-depressive symptoms. The results suggest that trait mindfulness may be a more robust protective factor than rumination and experiential avoidance in the development of depressive symptoms over one year.
Between 60 and 90% of patients consult their family doctor for stress-associated complaints. Not infrequently, a considerable number of these patients already have elevated blood pressure. The positive effect on high blood pressure of relaxation techniques has been confirmed in various studies. Accordingly, stress management should now have a permanent place in effective antihypertensive treatment. Appropriate relaxation techniques include, for example, autogenic training, progressive muscle relaxation, visualization and breathing exercises, chi gong and yoga. These practices are incorporated in various lifestyle programs. They act in different ways, and can be offered to the patient in accordance with his/her individual wishes.
Between 60 and 90% of patients consult their family doctor for stress-associated complaints. Not infrequently, a considerable number of these patients already have elevated blood pressure. The positive effect on high blood pressure of relaxation techniques has been confirmed in various studies. Accordingly, stress management should now have a permanent place in effective antihypertensive treatment. Appropriate relaxation techniques include, for example, autogenic training, progressive muscle relaxation, visualization and breathing exercises, chi gong and yoga. These practices are incorporated in various lifestyle programs. They act in different ways, and can be offered to the patient in accordance with his/her individual wishes.