Skip to main content Skip to search
Using Surveys of Students' Social-Emotional Learning and School Climate for Accountability and Continuous Improvement
Format: Report
Publication Date: Nov 30, 2016
Publisher: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse
Sources ID: 107136
Notes: Access: http://www.edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/SEL-CC_report.pdfExternal Resources: Cite This Item Search for versions with same title and author | Advanced options ...Access: http://www.edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/SEL-CC_report.pdfGeographic: California.Note(s): Cover and caption title./ "March 2017."/ Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-32)./ Also available online.Class Descriptors: LC: LB2806.22Other Titles: Using SEL and CC for accountability and continuous improvementResponsibility: Heather Hough, Demetra Kalogrides, Susanna Loeb.Material Type: Internet resource (url)Date of Entry: 20180130Update: 20180307Provider: OCLCAccess: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED574847External Resources: Cite This Item Search for versions with same title and author | Advanced options ...Access: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED574847 Note:               VIEW FULL TEXTNote(s): Availability: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site:http: //www.edpolicyinca.org./ Sponsoring Agency: S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation./ Abstractor: ERIC./ Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education./ Educational level discussed: Grade 10./ Educational level discussed: Grade 11./ Educational level discussed: Grade 12./ Educational level discussed: Grade 5./ Educational level discussed: Grade 6./ Educational level discussed: Grade 7./ Educational level discussed: Grade 8./ Educational level discussed: Grade 9./ Educational level discussed: Elementary Education./ Educational level discussed: Middle Schools./ Educational leveldiscussed: Secondary Education./ Educational level discussed: Junior High Schools./ Educational level discussed: High Schools.General Info: Preferred citation: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE.Responsibility: Heather Hough, Demetra Kalogrides and Susanna Loeb.Material Type: Document (dct); Internet resource (url)Date of Entry: 20170301Update: 20181120Provider: OCLCAccess: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED574847External Resources: Cite This Item Search for versions with same title and author | Advanced options ...Access: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED574847 Note:               VIEW FULL TEXTNote(s): Availability: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site:http: //www.edpolicyinca.org./ Sponsoring Agency: S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation./ Abstractor: ERIC./ Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education./ Educational level discussed: Grade 10./ Educational level discussed: Grade 11./ Educational level discussed: Grade 12./ Educational level discussed: Grade 5./ Educational level discussed: Grade 6./ Educational level discussed: Grade 7./ Educational level discussed: Grade 8./ Educational level discussed: Grade 9./ Educational level discussed: Elementary Education./ Educational level discussed: Middle Schools./ Educational leveldiscussed: Secondary Education./ Educational level discussed: Junior High Schools./ Educational level discussed: High Schools.General Info: Preferred citation: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE.Responsibility: Heather Hough, Demetra Kalogrides and Susanna Loeb.Material Type: Document (dct); Internet resource (url)Date of Entry: 20170301Update: 20181120Provider: OCLC
Visibility: Public (group default)
Abstract: (Show)
The research featured in this paper is part of the CORE-PACE Research Partnership, through which Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) has partnered with the CORE districts to conduct research designed to support them in continuous improvement while simultaneously helping to improve policy and practice in California and nationwide. Through this partnership, PACE coordinates and executes research with partners from all of California's top universities, including Stanford University, the University of Southern California, and the University of California, Davis, in addition to engaging researchers from universities and research organizations nationwide. This report and accompanying policy brief show that there is good reason to pursue the measurement of social-emotional learning (SEL) and school culture/climate (CC) as a way to better understand student and school performance. Using data from California's CORE districts--districts serving nearly one million students who have embraced systematic measurement of SEL and CC--this study shows that SEL and CC measures demonstrate reliability and validity, distinguish between schools, are related to other academic and non-academic measures, and also illuminate dimensions of student achievement that go beyond traditional indicators. This report also shows how the SEL and CC measures can be used to identify areas of improvement within schools, such as identifying subgroup gaps or differences in reports between various respondent groups. A figure and tables are appended. [For the accompanying policy brief, "Using Surveys of Students' Social-Emotional Learning and School Climate for Accountability and Continuous Improvement. Policy Brief 17-1," see ED574846.].